|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 ,
2006 ,
2007 ,
2008 ,
2009 ,
2010.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Subscribers-Only
discussion list. Not a subscriber?
Join today!
January 20, 2005
Today's topics: collective bargaining agreement, discrimination, employment,
employment application, race, sexual harassment, statute of limitations
- Ohio Supreme Court
- No Opinions
- First District Court of Appeals
- No Opinions
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Ohio Cases
- No Opinions
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Other States Cases
- Thurman v. Daimler Chrysler Inc. (January 20, 2005) (appeal from E.D.
Mich.)
-
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0032p-06.pdf
- Thurman worked for Daimler Chrysler and signed an employment application
that altered the statute of limitations period for any civil suit filed
against her employer. Thurman and her husband later sued Daimler
Chrysler for sexual harassment in violation of state civil rights act (Mich.
Comp. Laws § 37.2101) and race discrimination under Federal law, 42 USC § 1981
as well as negligent hiring, retention, supervision, and other tort claims.
District court ordered summary judgment for Daimler Chrysler based on the
elapsed statute of limitations agreed to in the employment application.
Thurman appealed the court's finding that their claims are time-barred.
Affirmed, and remanded for husband's remaining claims to be remanded to
state court.
|
Daily Case Updates
|