Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

January 25, 2005

Today's topics:  constitution, criminal, death penalty, diversity, employment, free speech, first amendment, ineffective counsel, preservation of claims, religion, retaliation, sufficiency of evidence, wrongful discharge
Ohio Supreme Court
No Opinions
First District Court of Appeals
No Opinions
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Ohio Cases
Jermer v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc. (January 25, 2005) (appeal from S.D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0041p-06.pdf
Jermer sued for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, alleging retaliation for complaining about air quality at his employer's plant.  District court awarded summary judgment to Siemens.  Affirmed.
 
Parks v. City of Columbus (January 25, 2005) (appeal from S. D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0040p-06.pdf
Parks appealed district court denial of declaratory and injunctive relief involving free speech.  Reversed, finding that the city "applied a regulation in such a way that restricts the freedom of speech of one of its citizens", and remanded with directions to enter judgment for Parks and for consideration of damages.
 
Richey v. Mitchell (January 25, 2005) (appeal from N.D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0039p-06.pdf
Richey was sentenced to death and petitioned for writ of habeas corpus after appeals in Ohio state courts failed.  District court denied request.  Reversed, finding that constitutional errors - Richey's conviction lacked support of sufficient evidence, that claims were preserved, and ineffective counsel - undermined reliability of conviction and sentence.
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Other States Cases
No opinions.

 

WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates