|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 or
2006.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Members-Only
discussion list. Not a member?
Join today!
January 28, 2005
Today's topics: breach of contract, copyright, diversity, estates,
employment, indemnification, interpleader, promissory estoppel, real estate,
warranty deed
- Ohio Supreme Court
- No Opinions
- First District Court of Appeals
- Kohlbrand v. Ranieri (January 28, 2005)
http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/1/2005/2005-ohio-295.pdf
The Kohlbrands purchased a lot from the Ranieris, and discovered an
undisclosed pipeline under the property. They sued and the Ranieris
brought in Monfort Supply Company who, in its conveyance of the property to
the Ranieris, had issued a general warranty. The Ranieris were granted
summary judgment against Monfort, requiring them to indemnify the Ranieris.
Monfort appealed the summary judgment ruling. Affirmed.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Ohio Cases
- Ventura v. Cincinnati Enquirer (January 28, 2005) (appeal from S.D.
Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0043p-06.pdf
Ventura sued the Enquirer on a number of grounds, including breach of
contract, after the allegedly Enquirer disclosed his identity to a grand jury.
Ventura, while assisting a former reporter who was being investigated by the
grand jury, illegally accessed a corporate voice mail system. The
district court granted summary judgment to the Enquirer. Affirmed.
United States v. Jenkins (January 28, 2005) (appeal from N.D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0044p-06.pdf
Jenkins and his co-defendant were granted their motion to suppress
evidence obtained during two searches. The government appealed, arguing
that the court erred because the evidence was admissible under the independent
source doctrine. Reversed and remanded.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals - Other States Cases
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Roger Miller Music, Inc. (January 28, 2005)
(appeal from M.D. Tenn.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0042p-06.pdf
Roger Miller sang country songs, licensed by Broadcast Music. When the
copyright was renewed after Miller's death, his daughter was entitled to
royalties. Broadcast Music filed an interpleader action to determine how
much was owed to each party. Miller's daughter claimed 12.5%, but Roger
Miller Music, which held the copyright interests of Miller's widow and other
surviving children, claimed it was only 7.14%. The district court
granted the daughter summary judgment. Roger Miller Music appealed.
Reversed, granting summary judgment to Roger Miller Music, and remanding
for distribution of interpleaded funds.
|
Daily Case Updates
|