|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 or
2006.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Members-Only
discussion list. Not a member?
Join today!
March
10, 2005
Today's topics: § 1983, due process, equitable tolling of SOL, False
Claims Act (FCA), independent medical exam (IME), Medicare, Railway Labor Act (RLA):
minor dispute, treble damages
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
- Ohio Supreme Court
- No opinions.
- First District Court of Appeals
-
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
- No opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
Airline Prof. Ass'n v. ABX Air, Inc. (March 10, 2005) (Appeal
from S.D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0122p-06.pdf
A pilot was required to be examined by an ABX-selected doctor before returning
from disability leave. The union filed a grievance that this violated the
collective bargaining agreement. While the grievance was pending, the union
filed for an injunction and declaratory judgment, based on their assertion
that ABX violated the Railway Labor Act. The district court found it had
jurisdiction, and granted summary judgment to the union. Vacated and remanded
for dismissal, because this was a "minor" dispute under the RLA and therefore
the district court did not have jurisdiction.
Keenan v. Bagley (March 10, 2005) (Appeal from N.D. Ohio)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0123p-06.pdf
Keenan petitioned for habeas relief but the district court found his petition
time-barred, because the statute of limitations had run. Vacated and remanded
for an evidentiary hearing, because even though petition improperly filed, no
showing of whether Keenan could use equitable tolling of the statute.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
Ballard v. United States (March 10, 2005) (Appeal from W.D.
Tenn.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0125p-06.pdf
Ballard was convicted of intent to distribute, and sentenced. She appealed,
citing ineffective assistance of counsel. Reversed, vacating sentence, and
remanded, because counsel should have raised Apprendi and Dale arguments on
appeal because Ballards sentence was based on the substance she was
convicted of transporting, and this was not clarified at the trial.
Gilbert v. Ferry (March 10, 2005) (Appeal from E.D. Mich.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0124p-06.pdf
Plaintiffs sued 4 justices of the Michigan Supreme Court, for failure to
recuse. The plaintiffs had previously filed a motion for recusal in state
court, and been denied. The distrcit court found that it did not have
jurisdiction over their § 1983 case because of the state ruling on the same
due process arguments. Affirmed.
United States v. Bradley (March 10, 2005) (Appeal from M.D. Tenn.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0121p-06.pdf
Bradley pled guilty and then appealed, arguing ineffective assistance of
counsel and that his plea agreement was no longer binding because of U.S. v.
Booker. Decline to review ineffective assistance on direct appeal, and
dismiss remainder of appeal because plea agreement occurred prior to Booker.
United States ex rel. A+ Homecare v. Medshares Mgmt Group (March 10, 2005)
(Appeal from M.D. Tenn.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0120p-06.pdf
Defendant appealed jury verdict and damages after being found liable under
the False Claims Act (FCA) (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733) for filing fraudulent
pension expenses on Medicare reporting forms. The district court remitted
the damage award, and then tripled it based on the FCA. Affirmed.
|
Daily Case Updates
|