|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 or
2006.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Members-Only
discussion list. Not a member?
Join today!
April 15, 2005
Today's topics: bankruptcy: preference claim, jury instructions:
lesser-included, sentence reasonableness, time served, withdrawal of plea
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
- Ohio Supreme Court
- No opinions.
- First District Court of Appeals
-
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
State v. Klein (April 15, 2005)
http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/Decisions/C-040176.pdf
Michaela M. Stagnaro, appellant; Philip R. Cummings, Asst. Prosecuting Atty,
appellee
Klein appealed his conviction for receiving stolen property. Affirmed,
finding evidence was sufficient to support conviction, but sentence modified
for time served.
State v. McIntosh (April 15, 2005)
http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/Decisions/C-040280.pdf
Mary Jill Donovan, appellant; Judith Anton Lapp, Asst. Prosecuting Atty.,
appellee
McIntosh appealed his convictions, and consecutive sentences. Affirmed,
finding that the sentences did not violate Blakely, and the denial,
pre-sentencing, of McIntosh's motion to withdraw his plea was not error.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
No opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
-
In re: Computrex (April 15, 2005) (Appeal from E.D. Ky.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0177p-06.pdf
The bankruptcy trustee appealed the district court order affirming the
bankruptcy court's dismissal of a §547(b) preference claim. Computrex's
practice was to "float" checks to generate as much interest as possible, and
then pay carriers. It also paid complaining clients before others, and when it
declared banktruptcy, owed Contech only $300 while owing $24 million to its
other clients. Affirmed, finding that freight payment agreement meant that
funds paid to Contech carriers were not part of Computrex's estate, but
Computrex was acting as bailee of funds.
United States v. Johnson (April 15, 2005) (Appeal from W.D. Mich.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0177p-06.pdf
Johnson was sentenced to supervised release, which he violated. The district
court resentenced him and Johnson appealed the new sentence. Affirmed, because
sentence was not unreasonable nor was it in plain error.
United States v. Johnes (April 15, 2005) (Appeal from E.D. Tenn.)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0175p-06.pdf
Jones appealed his conviction and sentence to manufacture methamphetamine and
possessing equipment. Affirmed conviction, finding evidence sufficient and
failure to include lesser-included jury instructions proper, but remanding for
resentencing in light of US v. Booker.
** ORDER **
Alley v. Beal (April 15, 2005)
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/05a0178p-06.pdf
Alley sought and received a stay of execution, pending proceedings in another
case (In re Abdur'Rahman, 392 F.3d 174 (http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/04a0428p-06.pdf)).
After the court decided that case, it vacated Alley's stay. Alley appealled
for rehearing en banc. Remanded to district court, to determine whether
Alley's petition is properly a 60(b) motion (http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule60.htm
).
|
Daily Case Updates
|