Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

Jan. 9, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Procedural - ineffective counsel, discriminatory, evidence
 

Ohio Supreme Court
No opinions.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
No opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
Franklin v. Anderson (January 9, 2005) (Appeal from S.D. Ohio)
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0005p-06.pdf
-  In December 1988, Franklin was found guilty of two counts of
aggravated burglary and one count of aggravated murder and  was
sentenced to death.  He began a long process of appeals, with each state
court affirming his convictions or dismissing his  claims as res
judicata.  On petition for habeas corpus to the Southern District of
Ohio, however, Franklin was found to have  two viable claims: service of
a biased juror and ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, neither
of which the court  found to be procedurally defaulted.  The court
granted a conditional writ of habeas corpus on these two issues.  In
addition,  although denying Franklin's petition on the remaining 26
claims, the district court granted a certificate of appealability on
three issues: ineffective assistance of trial counsel, discriminatory
use of peremptory challenges by the prosecutor, and the  prosecutor's
failure to provide the defense with material exculpatory and impeachment
evidence at trial.  Because Franklin  did not object to the district
judge's denial of habeas on any other issues, all other claims are
forfeited on appeal and are  not before this court.  U.S. v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).  The State appeals the conditional
grant of  habeas, and Franklin cross-appeals the denial of habeas on the
three issues certified for appeal.  Judgment AFFIRMED.
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
No opinions.
 
WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates