|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 or
2006.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Members-Only
discussion list. Not a member?
Join today!
Jan. 13, 2006
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
TOPICS:
- County veterans service commissions
- Evid/ Wit/ Trial - Damages - Tort Miscellaneous
- Contracts
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Ohio Supreme Court
-
- State ex rel. Union Cty. Veterans Serv. Comm. v. Parrott
(January 13, 2006) (2006-Ohio-92)
-
http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/newpdf/0/2006/2006-ohio-92.pdf
- County veterans service commissions - O.R.C. 5901.02 - Mandamus
issued to compel judge to appoint member of commission.
- First District Court of Appeals
- [Search Other Ohio Districts]
- Kahn v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (January 13, 2006)
(2006-Ohio-111)
-
http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/Summaries/C-040669.doc
- The trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendant
on a loss-of-consortium claim, where the claim was filed within the
four-year statute of limitations. The trial court erred in granting summary
judgment to the defendant on a punitive-damages claim, where reasonable
minds could have differed about whether a pharmacy and its employees were
aware that the failure to investigate a misfiled prescription had a great
probability of causing substantial harm to the plaintiff's daughters, and
about whether the pharmacy and its employees had consciously disregarded the
safety of the girls. Where a misfiled prescription was alleged to have
psychologically injured two girls, resulting in increased aggression and
sexualized behavior, the injuries were subjective in nature, and expert
testimony was required to establish future and permanent damages with
reasonable certainty; the failure to present such testimony entitled the
defendant to a directed verdict. Judgment AFFIRMED in PART, REVERSED in
PART, and CAUSE REMANDED.
Fifth & Race Ltd. Partnership v. W. & S. Life Ins. Co. (January 13, 2006)
(2006-Ohio-112)
-
http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/Summaries/C-050120.DOC
- The trial court erred by failing to enter summary judgment in favor
of the defendants in an action on a contract, when no genuine issues of
material fact remained with respect to the nonoccurrence of conditions
necessary to trigger a payment obligation. Judgment REVERSED and FINAL
JUDGMENT ENTERED. -
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
- Todd v. Weltman, Weinberg (January 13, 2006) (Appeal from S.D.
Ohio)
-
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0014p-06.pdf
- Defendant Weltman, Weinberg, & Reis Co., L.P.A. appeals an
August 3, 2004 collateral order of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Ohio denying Defendant's motion for judgment on
the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) against
Plaintiff Robert Todd's claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq., specifically violations of 15
U.S.C. §§ 1692e and 1692f. While the district court has not yet rendered
final judgment, this Court reviews the collateral order of the district
court denying Defendant absolute immunity. For the following reasons, we
AFFIRM the district court's order.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
-
-
No Opinion.
|
Daily Case Updates
|