|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 ,
2006 ,
2007 ,
2008 ,
2009 ,
2010.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Subscribers-Only
discussion list. Not a subscriber?
Join today!
March 7, 2006
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
TOPICS:
- Procedural due process
- Ohio Supreme Court
-
-
No Opinion.
- First District Court of Appeals
- [Search Other Ohio Districts]
-
No Opinion.
-
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
-
No Opinion.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
-
-
Fligiel v. Samson; et al (March 7, 2006) (Appeal from E.D. Michigan)
- http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0087a-06.pdf
- This is an appeal of the district court's refusal to set aside
its grant of summary judgment to the Veterans Administration (VA) in a
suit brought by a physician who was transferred to a VA facility without
notice and an opportunity to respond, as required by statute and
Veterans Administration agency regulations. The district court found
that Dr. Suzanne Fligiel's transfer was a "major adverse action,"
entitling her to procedural protections, including advance notice and an
opportunity to respond. However, the court held that the denial of
procedural due process was harmless error and granted the VA summary
judgment. On appeal, Fligiel argues that the application of the harmless
error test was inappropriate under Wilson v. Social Security, 378 F.3d
541 (6th Cir. 2004), and that the district court wrongly relied on
information outside of the agency record in making its determination. It
is unnecessary to address these claims on the merits, however, because
we find that judicial review of this matter was precluded in the first
instance. Therefore, we vacate the district court's grant of summary
judgment to the VA, with remand to the district court for an entry of
dismissal pursuant to United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439 (1988).
|
Daily Case Updates
|