Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

March 7, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Procedural due process
 

Ohio Supreme Court
 
No Opinion.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
 
No Opinion.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
 
No Opinion.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
 
Fligiel v. Samson; et al (March 7, 2006) (Appeal from E.D. Michigan)
-  http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0087a-06.pdf
-  This is an appeal of the district court's refusal to set aside its grant of summary judgment to the Veterans Administration (VA) in a suit brought by a physician who was transferred to a VA facility without notice and an opportunity to respond, as required by statute and Veterans Administration agency regulations. The district court found that Dr. Suzanne Fligiel's transfer was a "major adverse action," entitling her to procedural protections, including advance notice and an opportunity to respond. However, the court held that the denial of procedural due process was harmless error and granted the VA summary judgment. On appeal, Fligiel argues that the application of the harmless error test was inappropriate under Wilson v. Social Security, 378 F.3d 541 (6th Cir. 2004), and that the district court wrongly relied on information outside of the agency record in making its determination. It is unnecessary to address these claims on the merits, however, because we find that judicial review of this matter was precluded in the first instance. Therefore, we vacate the district court's grant of summary judgment to the VA, with remand to the district court for an entry of dismissal pursuant to United States v. Fausto, 484 U.S. 439 (1988).
 
WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates