Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

April 17, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Motion to stay - arbitration
- U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
 

Ohio Supreme Court
 
No Opinions.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
 
Albert M. Higley Co v. N/S Corporation (April 17, 2006) Appeal from N.D. Ohio
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0136p-06.pdf
-  N/S Corporation appeals the district court's denial of its motion to stay litigation and compel arbitration in a diversity action between itself and the Albert M. Higley Company. The issue before this Court is the interpretation of the arbitration clause in a contract between these two companies. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's decision denying N/S's motion to stay the litigation and compel arbitration.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
 
USA v. Jones  (April 17, 2006) Appeal from E.D. Kentucky
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0135p-06.pdf
-  Defendant-Appellant Wayne Morgan Jones ("Jones") was sentenced to twelve months of imprisonment for defrauding and attempting to defraud a financial institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344(1) and using another person's identity to commit this fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1028(a)(7) and (2). Jones appeals this sentence, arguing that the district court should have reduced his sentence pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G") § 5K2.23 because he had already served a one-year state sentence for the same conduct. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM Jones' sentence.
 
WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates