Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

April 20, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Michigan Mobile Home Commission Act
 

Ohio Supreme Court
 
No Opinions.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
 
Oswalt v. Meoli (April 20, 2006) Appeal from W.D. Michigan
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0141p-06.pdf
-  A Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee sought to avoid a security interest
in the debtors' affixed mobile home by challenging the security interest
as unperfected under Michigan law. The creditor moved for summary
judgment in the adversary proceeding, relying on an amendment to the
Michigan Mobile Home Commission Act ("MHCA"). The bankruptcy court
denied summary judgment, and the creditor appealed. On appeal, the
United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
reversed the bankruptcy court and granted summary judgment to the
creditor. The trustee appealed the summary judgment. We affirm the grant
of summary judgment to the creditor because the security interest in the
debtors' affixed mobile home was perfected properly under an amendment
to the MHCA. The amendment, despite its enactment after the rights in
the bankruptcy estate accrued, clarified the procedure for perfecting
security interests in affixed mobile homes. Because the amendment
clarified existing law and was not a new law, it relates back to and
controls the attachment of the security interest in the debtors' mobile
home.
 
WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates