Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools Events News About the Library
Welcome to the Hamilton County Law Library, a library serving legal professionals in Hamilton County, Ohio Welcome to the Hamilton County Law Library, a library serving legal professionals in Hamilton County, Ohio Extend Your Practice with the Hamilton County Law Library's legal research and services
 
    
            Follow HCLawLib on Twitter       
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Subscribers-Only discussion list.  Not a subscriber?  Join today!

November 14th, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Right to a Speedy Trial
 

Ohio Supreme Court
 
No Opinions.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
 
USA v. Watford (Nov. 14, 2006) (Appeal from W.D. Ky)
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/06a0421p-06.pdf
-  Defendant-Appellant Marlon L. Watford appeals from the District
Court's judgment of conviction and sentence following a jury's
guilty verdicts on counts of narcotics and firearm possession. Watford,
through his able counsel, contends that the District Court erred in
several critical respects by allowing this case to proceed to trial
after a lengthy pretrial delay during which the Government filed three
superseding indictments. He also  asserts that the District Court erred
in its handling of voir dire and several sentencing-related issues.
Having carefully considered Watford's arguments in light of the record
submitted on appeal, we find no reversible error in the District
Court's adjudication of this case. Accordingly, for the reasons
that follow, we AFFIRM.