Join!  |   Find Us  |   Contact Us  |   Search  |   Home
Services Online Catalog Research Tools CLE News About the Library
Search our online catalog for print and electronic legal resources.

Daily Case Update Archive

As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio State First District Court of Appeals, and the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.  You can read the latest summaries or archived summaries from 2005 or 2006.

If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates, please join our Members-Only discussion list.  Not a member?  Join today!

March 15, 2007

Ohio Supreme Court | Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio | U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
 

TOPICS:
- Sentencing Guidelines
 

Ohio Supreme Court
 
No Opinions.
 
First District Court of Appeals
[Search Other Ohio Districts]
 
No Opinions.
  
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals:  Ohio Cases
 
No Opinions.
 
U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
 
USA v. Bolden (March 15, 2007) (Appeal from W.D. Tenn.)
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/07a0100p-06.pdf
-  On December 23, 2002, Darrell C. Chalmers and Carlos Goodwin robbed
a Loomis Fargo armed car courier at the Wolfchase Galleria Mall in
Memphis, Tennessee. Defendant-Appellant Anthony Bolden, a security guard
at the mall, was the "inside man" in this robbery, providing Chalmers
and Goodwin with security camera angles and Loomis Fargo procedures.
Chalmers and Goodwin left the mall with $922,803.88 in stolen cash and
checks. Police arrested Chalmers several weeks later, and Chalmers
implicated Bolden as the mastermind of the robbery. After Bolden pleaded
guilty, the district court sentenced Bolden to imprisonment for 205
months. Bolden appeals that sentence, challenging two offense-level
enhancements that he received under the Sentencing Guidelines, the
district court's failure to lower the offense level because of Bolden's
purported acceptance of responsibility, and the reasonableness of the
sentence under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We affirm
Bolden's sentence.
 
WebCite Citation
  OR
Keyword Search:

Daily Case Updates