|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 ,
2006 ,
2007 ,
2008 ,
2009 ,
2010.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Subscribers-Only
discussion list. Not a subscriber?
Join today!
January 24, 2008
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
TOPICS:
- Sentencing Guidelines
- Federal conflict of interest / Prosecutorial misconduct / Sentencing /
Ineffective assistance of counsel
- Ohio Supreme Court
-
-
No Opinions.
- First District Court of Appeals
- [Search Other Ohio Districts]
-
No Opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
-
No Opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
-
-
USA v. Vicol (January 24, 2008) (Appeal from W.D. MI)
-
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/08a0042p-06.pdf
- Joshua Bruce Vicol was convicted of one count of kidnaping in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) and sentenced to 188 months in prison.
The government appeals the sentence imposed by the district court, arguing
that the sentencing guidelines range was improperly calculated. According to
the government, this error seriously affected the sentence and constitutes
reversible error. We agree with the government, and VACATE Vicol’s sentence
and REMAND this case for resentencing.
USA v. Coker (January 24, 2008) (Appeal from M.D. TN)
-
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/08a0043p-06.pdf
- A grand jury indicted Natalie Coker on five counts of conspiring to
defraud the United States, taking bribes, and violating the federal conflict
of interest laws. Coker pleaded guilty to a single count of committing an
illegal conflict of interest, in return for having the other charges
dropped. The district judge sentenced her to forty-six months of
imprisonment. Coker appeals, arguing that prosecutorial misconduct and
incorrect guidelines calculations warrant vacating her sentence. We affirm
because her various arguments are either waived, withdrawn, or meritless.
|
Daily Case Updates
|