|
|
Daily Case Update Archive
As a service to our members, we monitor opinions issued from the
Ohio Supreme Court, the
Ohio State First District
Court of Appeals, and the United
States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. You can read
the latest summaries or archived summaries from
2005 ,
2006 ,
2007 ,
2008 ,
2009 ,
2010.
If you would like to receive a daily e-mail with same-day case updates,
please join our Subscribers-Only
discussion list. Not a subscriber?
Join today!
June 2, 2008
Ohio Supreme Court
| Ohio First District | U.S. 6th Circuit - Ohio |
U.S. 6th Circuit - Other States
TOPICS:
- Bankruptcy / Chapter 13 / Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act
- Ohio Supreme Court
-
-
No Opinions.
- First District Court of Appeals
- [Search Other Ohio Districts]
-
No Opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Ohio Cases
-
-
No Opinions.
- U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals: Other States Cases
-
-
Schultz v. USA (June 2, 2008)(Appeal from E.D. TN)
-
http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/08a0206p-06.pdf
- Plaintiffs-Appellants Bernard Francis Schultz and Elizabeth Mary
Sabatine (hereinafter “the Schultzes”), husband and wife and residents of
Hamilton County, Tennessee, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 13 in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
Independently, the Schultzes filed a complaint for declaratory judgment in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee,
alleging that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of
2005 (“BAPCPA” or “the Act”) violates Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the
Constitution (the “Bankruptcy Clause”), which gives Congress the power to
establish “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United
States.” U.S. CONST. art. 1, § 8, cl. 4 (emphasis added). The district court
granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the
Schultzes’ complaint. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of
the district court.
|
Daily Case Updates
|