ANNUAL REPORT

   

Annual Report
Organizational Chart       
Statistics
Laboratory

Lab Director's Report       
FAQ

FAQ/Lab                         
Links

      

 

 

        

 

 

 

ANNUAL LABORATORY DIRECTORS REPORT 2006

 

The Hamilton County Crime Laboratory has completed another year of doing what it was designed to do, and doing it well.  Examinations of physical evidence assist judges and juries in determining guilt or innocence.  It has been a year of consolidating past gains and establishing a vision for the future. Analysts in all laboratory sections have been working hard in an environment of decreased funding, increasingly cramped space, and burgeoning case loads.  It is to the analysts’ credit that the y were able to do so much with so little.  The 16,091 cases submitted during 2006 marked it as a record year.  The 89 homicides in the City of Cincinnati also set a record.  Each represents a collection of tragic statistics.  The following are a few comments about how some of the major laboratory divisions coped with a daily onslaught of evidence from homicides, arsons, and assaults.

 

Serology/ DNA

§  This became a transition year for the DNA section. Analysts validated, implemented, and integrated past upgrades of equipment into the daily working routine.  These were instruments funded through a major federal grant.

 

§   In 2006, Tracy Cotterman completed her internal training and became a fully functioning Serologist/ DNA analyst. 

 

§   Troubleshooting problems with the new 3130 DNA analyzer and the real-time PCR Quantitation system challenged Joan Burke’s responsibilities as the DNA Technical Leader.  It is to her credit that the re was no loss in the quality of our examinations during this period of change over. 

 

§  Bill Harry also played a key role as LIMS assistant administrator and in-house software engineer to solve several of the installation problems. 

 

§  Additionally, the section engaged in a major project of handling a large number of “Contact DNA ” cases and evaluating the results.  What the y found will guide the policy of evidence acceptance practices during 2007. 

 

§  Even with over 30 cases completed per analyst per month, almost an equal number of new cases are submitted monthly.  Hence, it was difficult to make inroads into the backlog of over 150 cases. 

 

§  The good news for the section is that the County Commissioners have approved hiring an additional DNA analyst.  In addition to normal casework, the analyst will engage in development work to keep the lab close to the cutting edge of new technologies.  The only problem is finding laboratory space for the person to work.

 

Firearms/Toolmarks

§  During 2006, the section added to its digital imaging system.  Aided by IPAC funds from Hamilton County , new software helped establish a reference database.  The plan is to compare a live image from the comparison scope to a stored image from the database.  This system will augment the operation of the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN). 

 

§  Eugene Banga-an continued to gain experience as a firearms examiner by focusing on NIBIN entries.  He also attended Toolmark Examination training provided by ATF.  We hosted the weeklong workshop at our lab in September for Ohio crime lab examiners. 

 

§  Although formally retired, Bill Schrand continued working 4 days a week.  Mike Lehnhoff also continued to concentrate on firearms examinations although he has additional responsibilities in the questioned document section.

 

§  In 2006 the County Commissioners approved adding one more examiner to the section.  The lab was fortunate in being able to find an experienced examiner who will star in Jan 2007.  The current backlog of over 160 cases represents close to 6 months work.  The additional of a new analyst will mean that the laboratory will be able to do more than just keep up with court dates.

 

Trace Evidence

§  During 2006, the trace evidence section was finally able to eliminate the problems associated with the changeover to the new electron microscope system for analyzing primer residues (GSR).  Diligent work by Mike Trimpe eliminated the accumulated backlog of cases. The speed of the new instrument insured that cases were reported in time to be of use to the investigator.

 

§   Mat Wyatt finished his training and became a fully functional trace analyst.  At the end of the year, however, he decided to fur the r his career with the Army Crime lab in Atlanta .  In addition to replacing Mat, the laboratory will be spreading the responsibilities for trace examinations to o the r staff members.  Drug analysts  Jeri-Ann Beck will be learning footwear comparisons, and  Laura Kimble will be taking on more responsibility for fire debris analyses.  Katie Duncan in toxicology will be conducting glass examinations.  Additional examiners, yet to be named, will also contribute to the effort.

 

As always, the re was a lot going on in the crime laboratory in 2006.  There is no way anyone could claim “It was just ano the r year.”

 

Laboratory

Lab Director Report 2000

Lab Director Report 2001

Lab Director Report 2002

Lab Director Report 2003

Lab Director Report 2004

Lab Director Report 2005

Home